Provider
Efficiency Measurement Review Purpose of Efficiency Measurement
Review The Provider Efficiency Measurement Review offered by the Cave
Consulting Group is designed as a cost-effective product to evaluate your current
provider (practitioner or hospital) efficiency rating systems.1 As
leading experts in this field, the Cave Consulting Group will offer constructive
feedback on ways for you to improve current provider efficiency measurement--increasing
the accuracy and reliability of your existing measurement tools.
Who
Should Perform a Provider Efficiency Measurement Review? - Employers
and other healthcare purchasers interested in understanding how their provider-network
vendors (e.g., preferred provider organizations (PPOs), insurance carriers, HMOs)
are monitoring and improving the overall efficiency of care--versus just obtaining
network service price discounts.
- Insurance companies, health plans, and
third party administrators (TPAs) interested in improving the efficiency of their
provider networks and their medical loss ratios.
- Physician group and physician-hospital
organization leaders interested in monitoring and improving the efficiency of
their healthcare delivery systems.
- All companies that have selected or are
in the process of selecting a vendor software system for measuring provider efficiency.
Why Perform a Provider Efficiency Measurement Review? Most
recent evidence has suggested that about 10%-to-20% of practitioners, across specialty
types, practice inefficiently. The small percentage of practitioners is responsible
for driving up to 20% of the unnecessary, excess medical expenditures incurred
by employers and other healthcare purchasers--equating to billions of dollars
nationally. This finding translates into significant excess medical expenditures
for you as a healthcare purchaser: - If an employer's current healthcare
expenses are about $4,500 per employee (and the employer has 5,000 employees),
then this equates to $4.5 million in annual excess expenditures for the employer
($4,500 per employee x 20% excess expenses x 5,000 employees). Over a five-year
period, the employer may experience about $30 million in excess expenditures,
on a compounded interest basis.
- If a health plan's current healthcare expenses
average $4,500 per subscriber (and the health plan has 50,000 subscribers--or
about 115,000 unique members), then this equates to $45 million in annual excess
expenditures for the health plan ($4,500 per subscriber x 20% excess expenses
x 50,000 subscribers). Over a five-year period, the health plan may experience
about $300 million in excess expenditures, on a compounded interest basis.
In
a competitive market, an initial step is to identify the inefficient providers
and then allow market forces to improve market efficiency. Providers either become
more efficient, or are forced to leave the market. Yet, recent evidence has demonstrated
the difficulty in accurately identifying inefficient healthcare providers. For
example, leading practitioner efficiency measurement systems have only about 30%
agreement across measurement systems. This means that when one system ranks a
practitioner as "inefficient," only about 30% of the other systems ranked
the same practitioner as inefficient. The remaining 70% of systems ranked the
same practitioner as "efficient."2 Many
existing measurement systems inaccurately identify inefficient practitioners.
Moreover, the chances of finding inefficient practitioners may be random. These
findings show that existing systems have significant error in attempting to accurately
identify inefficient physicians. The error needs to be eliminated, or significantly
reduced, if employers, health plans, and other purchasers are to save money by
identifying and dealing with inefficient practitioners. Every physician falsely
measured as efficient (or inefficient) leads to continued inefficiency in the
healthcare marketplace. Prior Project Experience Over the years,
the Cave Consulting Group has evaluated many different types of provider (practitioner
and hospital) efficiency rating systems. As leading experts in this field, Cave
Consulting Group has examined efficiency rating systems for organizations delivering
care to more than 10 million members nationwide. We know the strengths and weaknesses
of the marketed software, groupers, and systems. Suggested Project Scope - Determine
whether the Provider Efficiency Measurement Review will involve practitioners,
hospitals, or both.
- Perform an onsite visit to review your current provider
efficiency measurement systems and methods.
- Review a discussion guide to
determine sources of potential provider efficiency measurement error--whereby
the guide reviews the applied software packages, methodologies, and efficiency
rating techniques.
- Complete a provider efficiency measurement scorecard.
- Produce
a final report that identifies the strengths and areas for improvement in provider
efficiency measurement. We will identify sources of provider efficiency measurement
error and suggest ways to reduce the measurement error.
Next Steps Please
contact us at the Cave Consulting Group for more
information on the Provider Efficiency Measurement Review. You will gain valuable
information from our cost-effective review process.
Copyright ©
2003 Cave Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
|